When I followed the link to the article at the Jerusalem Post, all of the comments under the article were in favor of Israel and against the Annapolis meeting.
“but both sides stuck to their positions, and Israel brought about the talks failure.”
How does that work? Both sides hold to their positions but it is only one side’s fault they do not reach aggrement?
Is Pali-land also Fantasyland?
Abbas says sides have failed to agree on a joint statement...
this f’n pali muzzie terrorits means...the Israelis have not announced they will give up their country and just allow the f’n muzzies behead all of them!!!!
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
The only “joint-statement” that heathen Abbas would agree to is if Olmerde came out (with Rice standing behing him shooting daggers from her eyes) and stated “today, we have come to an historic agreement, Israel will commit national suicide to show good will in bringing about a comprehensive peace with her neighbors.” May Heaven forbid such a thing ever happens! Anything else will cause Abbas/Saudis/Syrians, etc., etc., etc. to howl like the hyenas they are that there was “failure to agree on a joint statement.”
May this so-called “conference” go down like cold instant grits at a Paula Deen convention!