But the ground of sensational heresy in Mormonism is so fertile, how could one not find sensational material?
[I have become something of an historian on the early Mormon church]
“Judging from your post, searcher for anti-Mormon sensationalism would be more descriptive.”
Actually, no it wouldn’t. Unlike you, I actually quote from first hand historical works while you only cite bubkiss, nada, zilch, hot air - get my drift? I’ve just gotten into Ann Young’s account of her murderous, lying thieving polygamous husband Brigham Young. He was heavy into Blood Atonement - the killing of apostates and Gentiles. This same legacy lives on the the Mormon church, which excommunicates and culls dissenters in a less bloody but no less effective way.
Sensationalism is if I personally blew something out of proportion. When you get eye witness accounts of how Mormons act, it’s hard to call it sensationalism.
http://www.mazeministry.com/mormonism/19thwife/19thwifedownload.htm
Chapter ten about blood atonement and 13 about the Mountain Meadows massacre are particularly frightening. Why anyone would want to drag this legacy into the presidency is beyond comprehension.