—In other words, a man’s religion is completely and utterly meaningless. -—
No. It means that the politician shouldn’t be seen as a spokesperson or leader of the particular religious denomination to which they belong, which is exactly what Peggy said.
[No. It means that the politician shouldn’t be seen as a spokesperson or leader of the particular religious denomination to which they belong, which is exactly what Peggy said.]
Does that mean that Bishop/Stake President/ High Melchizedek Priest Mitt will not be influenced one iota by peep stones and the church?
Pardon me while I suspend all rational thinking to believe that.