Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg

” . . so that they could maintain a system in which they denied some people freedom?”

Well, sort of. Slavery was the system that the U.S maintained before, during and for awhile, after the WBTS. But if the goal for the South had been to simple maintain that system for themselves they would have simply remained in the Union.


13 posted on 11/25/2007 5:22:07 PM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Lee'sGhost

No, actually, without expansion of slavery into new states, slavery would have been extinguished politically. This is why a Republican President was unacceptable to the South.


14 posted on 11/25/2007 5:27:30 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Lee'sGhost
But if the goal for the South had been to simple maintain that system for themselves they would have simply remained in the Union.

Ah, but they couldn't protect slave imports or guarantee that slavery was expanded to the territories or that no state could outlaw slavery like the confederate constitution did. So it was half a loaf under the real Constitution or the whole loaf under the confederate one. Why is it surprising they chose rebellion?

17 posted on 11/25/2007 5:37:21 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson