To: Publius Valerius; Iwo Jima; All
All of you who have been talking about the Kirlins sitting on their thumbs for 20 years, did you read Joanie's reply #115 (apparently backed up by many of their neighbors--a fact that spunkets doesn't include in his excerpts from court proceedings, and he says that he only cited relevant portions)??????????
They apparently DID NOT sit on their thumbs for 20 years, and claims that they did are bogus.
To: Minuteman23
The issue is not what some poster puts on a website, the issue is, what was the evidence at trial? I read the FOF/COL. It seems pretty solid for the plaintiffs. What have you read?
I have never seen the Kirlins claim that they ever set foot of the property for 20 years. And they certainly did not bring suit to stop the unauthorized use of their property. THAT is sitting on their thumbs.
166 posted on
11/26/2007 6:53:37 AM PST by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
To: Minuteman23
They apparently DID NOT sit on their thumbs for 20 years, and claims that they did are bogus. If they filed an ejectment or quiet title action against the judge, then I'll change my tune. Otherwise, given that the judge won his quiet title action, it seems to me that they sat on their thumbs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson