[joanie-f]

This article states that more than two hundred of the Kirlins' Neighbors threw a party in support of the Kirlins. The contained video also shows several of them exhibiting an aerial photograph of the land, taken in 2006, which exhibits none of the paths that McLean and Stevens claim had been worn in the land through twenty years of use.

When Kirlin asked McLean why he was attempting to take a part of his land, Kirlin says that he responded that he needed room on the side of his house for ‘access to his back patio’. When Kirlin offered to give McLean five feet of his property for that purpose, Kirlin says that he was told that wasn’t enough. The amount of property that McLean wants is one-third of Kirlin’s land, which will render the remaining two-thirds too small to legally build on. McLean’s motives are transparent.

~ joanie

[george76]

Aerial pictures do not apparently validate the claims of a 20 year path created adversely by the perps.

Maybe a two year path ?