To: Still Thinking
Just finished a great book - “Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution”.
The federal gov’t nearly IMMEDIATELY reneged on the promise of enumerated powers. (Marshall)
Basically, there were those that were nationalists - Hamilton - that wanted a supreme national gov’t, and the states wouldn’t ratify, so they argued enumeration until ratification, then governed as they wished anyway.
26 posted on
11/26/2007 7:17:57 AM PST by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: MrB
A lot of us have noted Marshall's calumny in subverting things almost from the outset. The language of the legislation used to pass the BoR, the 14th Amendment, and subsequent court cases have all been part of the "tug of war" between those wanting more government power, and those wanting freedom.
It's a "tug of war" we're losing BTW... just in case anyone is keeping score.
29 posted on
11/26/2007 7:19:50 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: MrB
Basically, there were those that were nationalists - Hamilton - that wanted a supreme national gov?t, and the states wouldn?t ratify, so they argued enumeration until ratification, then governed as they wished anyway.Hmmm, yes. Hamilton, not my favorite founder.
30 posted on
11/26/2007 7:27:29 AM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: MrB
In Hamilton’s defense, he definitely wasn’t a gun grabber ...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson