Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teddyballgame

Honestly, this seems a bit far fetched to me. What would they hope to accomplish ? Attacking an army base ? No terror value what so ever. It’d end in all of their deaths and not a single civilian would be horrified. Other than the immediate reprecussion of public outcry for actual border security. Which would not be in their interest.

It just doesn’t make sense at all.


7 posted on 11/26/2007 8:36:12 AM PST by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: farlander

“It just doesn’t make sense at all.”

And blowing yourself up in the name of Allah does?!?


8 posted on 11/26/2007 8:37:18 AM PST by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
It just doesn’t make sense at all.

It makes perfect sense. They're at war with us.

9 posted on 11/26/2007 8:37:35 AM PST by IonInsights (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

actually i disagree...they dont expect to live , they expect tv coverage...


13 posted on 11/26/2007 8:40:48 AM PST by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
It just doesn’t make sense at all.

From a conventional analysis, you may be correct. However, the points they would score across the Arab world for bloodying our noses within our borders would be enormous. Everything they have done to date is done with cameras rolling with the idea of PR as a main goal.

14 posted on 11/26/2007 8:40:52 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

It just doesn’t make sense at all.
I agree - as the opening line states: “might have”


33 posted on 11/26/2007 9:16:42 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

It’d look good in the MSM and for recruiting.


34 posted on 11/26/2007 9:16:53 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander
>>>It just doesn’t make sense at all.<<<

It makes perfect sense - as did the threatened attack on Fort dix.

U.S. located bases have armed gards at the gates - other than that weapons, much less loaded ones, are not carried on base. Weapons are often kept under lock and key.

The terroristic impact of a successful attack on a military base would be huge on the general public. It's a symbolic target, like the WTC, with implictions far more important than the physical damage.

46 posted on 11/26/2007 10:10:07 AM PST by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

Depending on the configuration of the base, it might be possible for the terrorists to attack base housing or schools, targeting the wives and children of soldiers serving overseas. That would have a strong psychological impact on deployed service members.

Only the security forces are regularly armed on military bases in the US.


47 posted on 11/26/2007 10:13:24 AM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson