Okay, that’s what you have gleaned from this and I can accept it. What will you say next spring if a Palestinian state is recognized and Israel has to give up half of Jeusalem? What will you say when the Palestinians destroy the regligious treasures of Israel in Jerusalem like they did Joseph’s tomb? Then what will you say next year about this time when Syria has armed the new Palestinian state in the same manner as it has the Hezballah in southern Lebanon? And what will you say in the spring of 2009, when the Palestinians invade Israeli territory and exact thousands if not tens of thousands of fatalities before Israel can fight them off?
Will you still defend Condi? I won’t.
IMO, this is precisely the scenario Condi is ushering in. And I for one detest it.
We see this differently. What Gaffney has said is strong. If he is proven wrong, he will bear the weight of it. If he isn’t the State Department will hate his arse anyway. The State Department is a real den of iniquity IMO. It would be a badge of honor for them to dispise my ideology.
I'll say "Let's roll". We'd have to intervene. But there are plenty of other possible outcomes. I'll reserve judgement until we get more details.
If Gaffney wanted to exert his influence on Rice, he should have refrained from starting out by comparing her to a rapist. It's bad salesmanship, and it's counterproductive.