The blog contains comments and links in those comments from many studying Kotlikoff’s estimates. They are a group. They are the Kotlikoff Study Group because there is no formal group that studies Kotlikoff’s estimates.
And linking to his paper does not make you any sort of expert. As has been shown before, your intepretations of his paper and other materials concerning the FairTax are deceptive. You care about only one thing, disrupting FairTax threads with points taken out of context and designed to cause confusion. Witness your lame attempt in post #28 and my response in post #39.
The blog contains comments and links in those comments from many studying Kotlikoff’s estimates.It's a blog entry that basically posted the abstract from the paper I linked to. The people "studying Kotlikoff’s estimates" are just the blog's reader comments.
They are a group.It's just a blog with comments, they aren't a group in any real sense.
They are the Kotlikoff Study Group because there is no formal group that studies Kotlikoff’s estimates.Huh? This blog post with comments is the "Kotlikoff Study Group" because there is no formal group that studies Kotlikoff’s estimates. Are you kidding?
And linking to his paper does not make you any sort of expert.I didn't claim it did. I linked to the paper so people could read it for themselves. You linked to a blog entry and some comments and called it "the actual Kotlikoff study group."
As has been shown before, your intepretations of his paper and other materials concerning the FairTax are deceptive.Again, this is a really tired FairTaxer game where they claim someone's points have previously been refuted but fail to show where.
You care about only one thing, disrupting FairTax threads with points taken out of context and designed to cause confusion. Witness your lame attempt in post #28 and my response in post #39.Uh huh. Exactly how is my post #28 out of context. Be specific.