Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater
What we are concerned about is men in their 20s, 30s, 40s and older preying on young people>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Then raise the age of consent to 18 and enforce it.

If the age of consent is 16, then the age of consent is 16.

That means if a 16 year old consents to have sex witha 90 year old, then thats just the way the law is.

Liberals are so weird. They want a low age of consent of 16 but not for people who are 20 with people who are 16?

So between ages of 16 and 19 consensual sex is OK.

But we don't want them exploited by those who are experienced with sex?

I don't get the logic here on what they consider to be exploitation.

What is exploitation?

Why not make exploitation the crime?

Then I suppose they all would be in jail.

5 posted on 11/27/2007 5:54:37 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7

“Then raise the age of consent to 18 and enforce it.”

Yes, but only for heterosexual sex when the couple is legally married. Otherwise make the age of consent 21 for heterosexual sex.

Are far as homosexual sex, there should be no age of consent because it should be illegal at any age.


8 posted on 11/27/2007 6:02:25 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson