Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

I prefer number 2. Saves money.


9 posted on 11/28/2007 5:38:11 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Illegal Immigration, a Clear and Present Danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$

Actually I’ve read where the death penalty is MORE expensive after you get done with the endless appeals, lawyer costs, etc. I’m not against the death penalty, just seems that we could streamline the process a bit. On the other hand, I’d rather be dead than live the rest of my life in prison.


79 posted on 11/29/2007 6:40:24 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$
I prefer number 2. Saves money.

A serious problem with imposing the death penalty for any but the most serious crimes is that a criminal who has not been caught but is marked for death has nothing to lose by anything he might do to avoid capture. While the death penalty may have a stronger deterrent effect than a prison term, the reduction in initial crime may be offset by the extra crimes that criminals do to avoid capture.

84 posted on 11/29/2007 9:14:05 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson