[CharlesWayneCT]

Now you are just being obstinate.

I’ve shown that his statement was factually correct under both his common-sense view of the numbers, AND your insistance on taking into account the margin of error.

I should think that even with your hyper-partisanship you ought to be able to admit that you’ve been had here.

You can instead ignore it like it didn’t happen, and maybe your fred supporters will publicly keep silent about it, but they know the truth.

Come on, we all have to admit sometimes that we screwed up. You could just offer pissant an apology for falsely maligning his character, and we could all go back to shilling for our candidates.

Or you could pretend it didn’t happen, but I know I couldn’t ignore my own culpability in such a false accusation. No person of character could.

[Petronski]

I’ve shown that his statement was factually correct under both his common-sense view of the numbers, AND your insistance on taking into account the margin of error.

No, you haven't, unless by "common-sense view of the numbers" you mean "statistically ignorant view of the numbers."

[Petronski]

Or you could pretend it didn’t happen, but I know I couldn’t ignore my own culpability in such a false accusation. No person of character could.

You continue to repeat that sleazy charge, hoping it will become true. It will not.

[greyfoxx39]

Well, CW, here's some really GOOD news for you: Marie Osmond wants Mormon in Oval Office

Link

Obama has OPRAH, Hillary has STREISAND, and Mitt has....MARIE!