Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plan to Destroy Opec (Zubrin's "Energy Victory")
Energy Daily ^ | 11/28/2007 | Alan Walters

Posted on 11/28/2007 9:56:31 AM PST by cogitator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: sam_paine

Did you read my post? I address the refining issue. Essentially what I suggest is putting a floor price on imports. I suggest a floor low enough not to likely kick in, and high enough to stimulate domestic shale oil production. $35 a barrel. Even $30 would do. If the price of imports drops below the floor, a tariff kicks in to keep the imports from undercutting domestic production. If the tariff kicks in I also would require every dollar offset dollar for dollar the federal taxes on the refined product. Importing refined product would also be hit with the floor.

I am not suggesting we create another fiasco like what happened with steel tariffs. I am suggesting that it is in our national interest to be able to give dipwads like the Saudis and Venuzuelans the proverbial finger once we are largely energy self sufficient.


81 posted on 11/29/2007 7:57:44 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Yes. I did read your post. And nowhere in it do you describe how you would keep foreign COMMODITY gasoline from undercutting domestic production.

If the tariff kicks in I also would require every dollar offset dollar for dollar the federal taxes on the refined product.

If your tariff kicks in, then that means the world crude price is lower than your target crude price, thus foreign refined product is also somewhat cheaper.

Please, expand upon how/what you mean by 'dollar for dollar' and how that keeps the price of domestic oil artificially high without keeping the cost of refining domestically artificially high.

82 posted on 11/29/2007 8:50:54 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I would apply the tariff to refined products as well. Crude or refined, a price floor on imported product. $35 a barrel for crude, and whatever the equivalence is for refined product.


83 posted on 11/29/2007 9:38:32 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Brazil burns a lot of oil, and actively explores offshore for ever-more crude as its consumption has risen. Conservation is one necessary step on the road, and that will require intelligent intervention by the government. Other necessary steps include a restructure of taxes, opening (and reopening) areas for drilling and production, biofuels, and enhancement of electricity production. Oh, and BTW, Zubrin's a flake.

Energy Victory: Winning the War on Terror by Breaking Free of Oil Energy Victory:
Winning the War on Terror
by Breaking Free of Oil

by Robert Zubrin


84 posted on 05/30/2008 8:20:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson