“Thank you for pointing that out. If you are familiar with this case, you would know that there was no “in the past.””
One would have to be “familiar” with case beyond what was given in the article, because nothing in the article refers to verifiable past activity of a similar nature - pro or con. If your more “familiar” with the case than the article, concerning the past, thanks for that input and then, on that basis, the GOP guy and the ACLU might have a case. Keep me posted if you are going to continue to follow it. This may be one case where FIRE and the ACLU team up.
True, this whole thing has being going on for some months now, and I've been loosely following it off and on as time permits. One of the more interesting aspects is that while Mr. Lennox was filming in one building, he was "assaulted" by a member of the CMU management who tried to knock his camera out of his hands.
Today's latest news is that CMU is apparently going to try to expel Mr. Lennox for being in violation of some kind of campus rules. The story is on today's edition of RedState.Org and also in the local Saginaw Michigan newspaper, if you'd care to see it.