To: Politicalmom
as well as the fact that he also used taxpayer money for bodyguards and drivers for his mistress. See... that's what I mean. You're reading what you want to read, not what's there. There's nothing in the story about security for Nathan. It's the Mayor's security detail, for his trips. It may come as a surprise to you, but the mayor's security detail even goes along on personal trips. Imagine that.
I know you hate the guy. That's pretty clear. But making stuff up just makes your side look pathetic.
64 posted on
11/28/2007 4:02:31 PM PST by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ramius
No, I am going on another story from early in the year.
He hired police bodyguards for her. They drove her to get her hair and nails done and to pick her daughter up at school.
To: Ramius
And I’m not the one who jumped to conclusions and now looks pathetic.
To: Ramius; All
Lets not forget the BIG reason why Republicans lost congress. It was for dirty dealing, just like what Giuliani has done. And this kind of potentially criminal activity is why Hillary Clinton's negatives are so high.
This is not going to be just a problem for Republicans and or conservatives (yeah we get blamed for everything), the average voter is going to have a big problem with this kind of activity.
69 posted on
11/28/2007 4:35:10 PM PST by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson