Note real carefully that the question was not inquisitory, such as "are you?" It was accusatory, such as in "why are you?".
That was the first tip off I and many had that it was a classic Democrat/MSM "set up", in the first 10 seconds. Millions more figured it out in the next few seconds. The blogosphere is on fire with this story.
I’m a retired brigadier general with 43 years of service.
Interesting how the use of an illegal title (outside the state of CA) and a deceptive claim to 43 years service, by an openly homosexual man, can turn what should have been a republican candidate debate into a three ring circus.
...and where does the responsibility lie? I might have to say CNN as moderator had full responsibility to conduct a debate not a three ring circus. You don’t suppose there will be an ounce of fallout for CNN? I didn’t think so.