Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Official: Afghanistan Air Strike Hit Legitimate Targets
American Forces Press Service ^ | Donna Miles

Posted on 11/28/2007 10:03:38 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Nov. 28, 2007 – An air strike earlier this week in eastern Afghanistan was based on credible intelligence from multiple sources and by all indications struck its intended targets, the Pentagon’s press secretary told reporters today.

NATO International Security Assistance Force troops used precision-guided munitions in the late Nov. 26 air strike in the mountainous Nuristan province, killing several insurgents, Geoff Morrell said during a Pentagon briefing. Abdullah Jan, the western Nuristan Taliban commander, is believed to be among those killed.

Morrell dismissed press reports that the attack had mistakenly killed civilian construction workers. He noted that the closest known construction site was a kilometer away from the target area and that no structures, vehicles or other construction equipment were anywhere near the impact area.

“We deem it at this point a legitimate air strike,” Morrell said. He cited reports from ISAF and U.S. commanders in Afghanistan. “They had a legitimate target, they had multiple credible sources, and they believe they got their target,” he said. “And at this point, there is no indication to believe there were the civilian casualties as are being described.”

Morrell emphasized that the United States and its coalition partners never target civilians in their operations, but noted that “the Taliban most certainly does.” Taliban fighters “most certainly put civilians in harm’s way, use civilians as human shields (and) launch attacks from the midst of civilians,” he said. “And they often, in the aftermath of a legitimate operation like this one, raise this issue of civilian casualties,” he said.

“We have no indication at this time that there were anything other than legitimate targets killed in this operation,” he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; airstrike; frwn; legitimate; targets

1 posted on 11/28/2007 10:03:40 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketFR WAR NEWS!Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!


Not for commercial use. For educational and discussion purposes only.
2 posted on 11/28/2007 10:04:03 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I suspect this is a bid for death compensation payments that Uncle Sam hands out for civilian casualties. Typical small time scam.


3 posted on 11/28/2007 10:07:52 PM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Amen - there’s one ambushing group gone - May there be more who meet the same fate - about time they got into the Kunar with the gunship
4 posted on 11/28/2007 10:19:48 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
This is a relief to hear after reading the earlier stories about Afghan construction workers being “bombed.”

Nevertheless unintended friendly casualties are bound to occur in any war. Some can be avoided some can’t. In Vietnam we carried Dayglo air panels—rectangular panels of iridescent orange fabric. We wood stretch these markers out on the ground, drape them on foliage, attach them to the backpack of a man moving in a column. The air panels could be seen from the air and signaled to pilots that we were friendlies.

5 posted on 11/28/2007 10:36:24 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

That isn’t what the trusty TV was reporting...


6 posted on 11/28/2007 11:56:09 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson