Skip to comments.
‘No way’ was the general a Clinton plant, CNN producer says
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^
| 11-29-2007
| --
Posted on 11/30/2007 3:03:59 AM PST by johnny7
The man who put together Wednesday nights CNN/YouTube presidential debate said theres no way that a retired general who asked Republican candidates a gays-in-the-military question was a plant by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Its hard to imagine that that was a plant. He had no idea none that his question was going to be used, said David Bohrman, senior vice president for CNN and executive producer of the Florida debate.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cnn; denial; gopdebates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
1
posted on
11/30/2007 3:04:02 AM PST
by
johnny7
To: johnny7
Tell it to the hand, dude.
2
posted on
11/30/2007 3:06:00 AM PST
by
rvoitier
To: johnny7
Oh so they flew him into the studio at CNN expence and didn’t plan to use his question?
3
posted on
11/30/2007 3:06:16 AM PST
by
mware
To: johnny7
He’s a CNN plant. They’re trying to change the subject.
4
posted on
11/30/2007 3:07:11 AM PST
by
antinomian
(Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
To: johnny7
CNN and their “it depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is” moment.
To: johnny7
I heard that they flew the general to the debate so that he could ask his question. Don’t tell me that they did not know what the question was.
I believe them when they say he wasn’t a Clinton plant. He clearly was a CNN plant, and CNN is the Clinton News Network. It doesn’t matter that Hillary herself did not engineer this.
6
posted on
11/30/2007 3:07:28 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: johnny7
7
posted on
11/30/2007 3:08:31 AM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(You're a destiny that God wrapped a body around.)
To: johnny7
They really think we’re as dense and stupid as they are.
8
posted on
11/30/2007 3:08:50 AM PST
by
barker
( A smile is a curved line that sets things straight.)
To: mware
cnn is a pack of rabid lying rats... we know they lie... they lied for years about saddam... and I HATE LIARS!
LLS
9
posted on
11/30/2007 3:12:04 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: johnny7
Riiiiiiiight.
CNN never tells the truth. Why would they start now?
Give it up, CNN. We all know your agenda.
10
posted on
11/30/2007 3:12:16 AM PST
by
Allegra
(Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
To: Brilliant
You have no evidence beyond speculation that the beast didn’t know... but we have hildebeast’s own actions recently planting questions and questioners at the dim debates. Where there is fire there is smoke.
LLS
11
posted on
11/30/2007 3:13:38 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: johnny7
He had no idea it was going to be used, but he just happened to be in the audience, yeah right. And Cooper just happened to know he was in the audience....How stupid do they think the American people are.
Every “undecided” question that the CNN producers thought was relevant to a Republican Debate, just happened to be one submitted by hard-core leftist and Dim campaign activists. Talk about a coincidence. I guess it is just luck that all the You Tube questions picked for the Dim debate were softballs submitted by Dim cheerleaders.
12
posted on
11/30/2007 3:13:45 AM PST
by
NavVet
(O)
To: antinomian
ClintonNewsNetwork: Deny... delay... deny...
13
posted on
11/30/2007 3:15:06 AM PST
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: johnny7
One selected of 5000?
Perhaps he should play the NC ‘education’ lottery.
Do you think I could get him to pick my numbers?
14
posted on
11/30/2007 3:16:35 AM PST
by
RangerM
To: LibLieSlayer
It doesn’t really matter whether she knew. It was scripted. It was CNN demonstrating its commitment to fixing the election.
To: NavVet
I forget who it was, but one of the talk show panels suggested getting David Limbaugh to ask a question at the next Dem debate.
16
posted on
11/30/2007 3:17:32 AM PST
by
mware
To: barker
Ya, but by digging in they’re only giving the story more legs... Trying to deny the obvious is always entertaining - and futile...
17
posted on
11/30/2007 3:17:54 AM PST
by
DB
To: johnny7
To make sure that he wasnt an obvious campaign supporter, we took the next step of looking in the FEC records, to make sure he hadnt contributed, which I think is the best way to make sure someones not in a campaign. People who really are give money, Bohrman said.
18
posted on
11/30/2007 3:18:09 AM PST
by
maggief
To: johnny7
.....and then, off camera, he admitted,
"If we DARED impugn Ms. Clinton, they would exterminate me, too.
Besides we have a history of supporting all terrorists."
19
posted on
11/30/2007 3:20:07 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: johnny7
What they are doing is trying to shift the heat from themselves to the Clinton campaign. It’s not going to work but it’s fun to watch the commies back stab each other.
20
posted on
11/30/2007 3:21:03 AM PST
by
antinomian
(Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson