Paul is a great espouser of free trade. Just because we won’t pay the defense budgets of foreign countries so they can spend more on social programs doesn’t mean we want to wall ourselves off. How bizzare to arrive at such a conclusion...
Unfortunately, the entire Democratic party is against free trade, due to their unions, and even republicans are getting all hot and bothered about ‘red china’ and obsessed with manufacturing ‘losses’, ‘buy American’ and all this. Paul is not in favor of government managed trade, where political donations must be given to ensure you are included a ‘trade quota’ in the next gubermint thousand page trade agreement. He believes free trade can occur without government, that private individuals from around the world can trade with each other freely.
So, I think you may be a bit uninformed on Paul’s positions.
Very nice and patient of you to try and Clarify Dr. Pausl's TRUE position on these things ...
The thing is I don't think it makes a difference I believe that N.Z. already knows the truth of what you say ... He just chooses to make bald faced lies because he cannot reasonable argue his position ... even the most virulent Paul haters on this site are not foolish enough to try and accuse RP of being a Communist ...
so either N.Z. is a liar, or he really is uneducated about about the political concepts of Communism vs Classic Liberalism and Libertarianism.
I hope for his sake it was simply miseducation...
but N.Z. I am willing to entertain you and educate myself if necessary please provide Dr. Pauls policies that fall in line with Communism...
Thanks,
SubbyG