[hotshu]

My reason for asking (tinfoil hat ON) is that IF the guy’s name turns out to be Eisenberg, maybe, just maybe, the Bennets (his dad also called in to FNC) were planting bad info on FNC to discredit them after the debate debacle that CNN just perpetrated.

(tinfoil hat OFF)

[Dinah Lord]

My reason for asking (tinfoil hat ON) is that IF the guy’s name turns out to be Eisenberg, maybe, just maybe, the Bennets (his dad also called in to FNC) were planting bad info on FNC to discredit them after the debate debacle that CNN just perpetrated.

(tinfoil hat OFF)

Hmmm. Intriguing thought.

[MCH]

After having channel hopped for the past few hours, I can say that FNC has pretty much screwed this thing up & put out all kinds of information that has proven to be either questionable or wrong (wrong guy, wrong number of hostages, wrong report about no hostages inside when there still were).

Sad to say, MSNBC in particular (CNN a little bit better - at least on the number of hostages) appear at this point to have gotten things pretty much right all along, and they've had better live video. Better local affiliates? Straight info pipe to DNC folks & campaign staffers (they ARE the DNC after all)? Who's to say.

All I know is Fox is looking pretty stupid right now, which is sad cause I can't stand to watch either of the other two networks due to all the leftist whining & propaganda that "colors" everything they report.

[UCANSEE2]

“My reason for asking (tinfoil hat ON) is that IF the guy’s name turns out to be Eisenberg, maybe, just maybe, the Bennets (his dad also called in to FNC) were planting bad info on FNC to discredit them after the debate debacle that CNN just perpetrated.”

BINGO!

Finally someone sees through the smoke and mirrors.