[garbanzo]

If savage can get to trial though, he might still be able to force the naming of the financial backers.

I have to object to the misuse of the legal system here. Its purpose is to settle actual disputes under law not to embarrass political enemies. Again would we like it if FR was subject to endless frivolous suits just to find out who the "real" backers of the site are?

[bluefish]

Quit your legal pinhead whining and stop comparing CAIR to FR - they are wholly different. Keep it up and I will begin to think you are an undercover CAIR operative. You sound like an academic living in a fantasy legal theory textbook world. This is the real world.

The "slippery slope" argument that you keep advancing is a logical fallacy.

CAIR misuses the legal system on a regular basis. What goes around comes around. In this case, CAIR's objectives are too sinister to not use the legal, political and social systems, as well as the media, in any way possible, to expose them for what they are. That is how things get done in the real world. Your comments sound like the same people who lose wars because they insist on fighting them in a politically correct fashion.

[bluefish]

Oh, and CAIR is not just a “political enemy.” They are enemies of life, liberty and the pursuite of happiness. That calls for extraordinary measures.