Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene

Yes, it was. First, we KNOW innocent people were killed, so why not apologize? It is also good tactics, since it diffuses anger. And the Army DID an investigation - but the Marines didn’t like where it was headed.


61 posted on 12/01/2007 11:45:45 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Mitt is the Kama Sutra of Republican politics. Huckabee is Sandra Day O'Connor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers; RedRover
Well, Gen. Conway apparrently did not approve of Col. Nicholson's comments. He was fine with the solatia payments and expressing sympathy for the deaths. But the way I read his comments, he did not approve of assuming their guilt so publicly before any investigations were complete.

Speaking of investigations, here's a link that indicates there was a coordinated attack with a SVBIED and small arms fire. Lawyers: Evidence backs MarSOC's claims

According to the lawyers who have seen the pictures (from the Army intelligence report), photos show shot up military vehicles. Their information is based on the ARMY's reports in this link. Also of interest in the link is info about a raid on April 29 of a suspected car bomb cell in Nangarhar, near where the Marines' convoy was attacked. The raid that killed 6 also sparked a large protest. Maybe the car bomb cell folks were innocent also?
69 posted on 12/01/2007 12:10:47 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson