Skip to comments.
Ron Paul's "noninterventionism" fraud
Bidinotto Blog & The New Individualist ^
Posted on 12/01/2007 7:52:54 AM PST by mnehring
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-327 next last
To: mnehrling
or example, Paul repeatedly cites as aggression U.S. government actions that helped to topple and replace the Iranian regime of Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953. However, Paul rarely mentions these days (as he did on Dec. 3, 2002) that the U.S. and Britain did so "to prevent nationalization of Iranian oil." The author can't get his facts straight. The only company taken over was British Petroleum. It had already been nationalized under the Labour govenrment. Thus, it was government owned BEFORE Mossadegh took it over, just as it was after the Iraqis took it over.
To: Gondring
I wonder if the anti-Paul globalists would support the US Army going to Nigeria and recovering my investment if it goes badly. I wonder why we didn't protect Chechnya from Russia?
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Hey the Clinton Chinese Mafia War Room Rep shows up! Getting a bit slow on the recruiting for Cut&Ron Paul?? You weren’t in NH yesterday were you?? That was real Presidential the way she handled that. Not sure your getting such a bang for your buck here, Plant.
Pray for W and Our Troops
43
posted on
12/01/2007 8:53:40 AM PST
by
bray
(Let's Bring Christ Back to Christmas)
To: Tears of a Clown
There are more truthers/racists supporting ron paul than actual libertarians. That $10.4 million Paul has raised in two months. All of it from Truthers/Neo-Nazis, right?
Anywho, you're a lying sack of excrement. Here's what you wrote on November 5th:
This thread has really changed the way I look at Ron Paul. I didnt realize how unfair I and many other people here had been to the Congressman. I kind of assumed you all were pinkos and truthers, but Ron Paul himself certainly doesnt deserve to be maligned so viciously and childishly.
RON PAUL MONEY BOMB EXPLODING, POST #192
To: billbears
A strange breed of Objectivists. They think it was great to overthrow the Iranian government in 1953 so the British government can get its government owned oil company (which had already been nationalized by the Labour government) back.
To: Captain Kirk
It had already been nationalized under the Labour govenrment. Excellent point. But the socialist anti-Paulites wouldn't want to point that out...socialism helps their globalist agenda.
46
posted on
12/01/2007 9:00:04 AM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: bray
Nice job!
Helping your socialist agenda by pointing the finger at others...clever!!!
Folks are catching on now, though.
47
posted on
12/01/2007 9:01:08 AM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: bray
Apologize to the Canadian troops who have been our staunch ally in the WOT.
To: billbears
I think for myself. I decide who I choose to vote for not by their label but by what they say and if I agree with it. I know this is a foreign concept to the 'faithful' but there it is How unAmerican (for the 21st Century)! :-(
49
posted on
12/01/2007 9:02:12 AM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
Okay, I’ll make my sentence clearer...it was written poorly:
How can the people rely upon the Second Amendment as written, if we distort Article I, Sections 8-10 or Article II, Section 2?
50
posted on
12/01/2007 9:04:11 AM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Tears of a Clown
LIAR!
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Alex Jones and Stromfront tripX.
Alex Jones and Stormfront.
52
posted on
12/01/2007 9:09:35 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
To: canuck_conservative
In other words, even though the US isnt located anywhere near the Middle East, American boys must continue to die in some Middle-Eastern hellhole because .... what was the reason again? YAWN zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Maybe you had better read the article -- it's obvious that you haven't done so.
53
posted on
12/01/2007 9:11:46 AM PST
by
Turret Gunner A20
(Tolerating intolerance is not a "value," it's self-destructive stupidity.)
To: mnehrling
‘with intellectual trash-talk about American imperialism, anti-immigrant border fences, the fetus’s “right to life,” and the de facto pacifism of “noninterventionism,”’
The author of this article is upset that Dr. Paul is pro-life and anti-illegal-immigration. I can not agree.
The main criticism I would make of Ron Paul’s foreign policy, is that it is dishonorable. The USA has taken on obligations to other nations, that must be fulfilled. As George Washington said in his famous farewell address:
“The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.”
Unfortunately Ron Paul has a selective memory about what George Washington actually said.
54
posted on
12/01/2007 9:14:50 AM PST
by
devere
To: Darksheare
Dr. Paul doesn’t share the views of Alex Jones or Stormfront.
To: Allegra; SJackson
56
posted on
12/01/2007 9:16:00 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
To: canuck_conservative
Well, judging by the outright hostility some on this forum have to actually following the US Constitution, its an understandable mistake. Oh, do, please give us some lessons in the United States Constitution and its meaning. In particular show us the section on isolationism.
57
posted on
12/01/2007 9:16:25 AM PST
by
Turret Gunner A20
(Tolerating intolerance is not a "value," it's self-destructive stupidity.)
To: devere
Selective????? Washington warned about permanent alliances in that speech. Why did you “selectively” leave out that part?
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Then why does he accept donations from the latter, and why has he been on Alex Jones show not once but twice?
Why not come out and say what he truly thinks of troofers and refuse donations from the fronters?
59
posted on
12/01/2007 9:17:10 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Cordite Chipmunk, the Splodent Rodent.)
To: hedgetrimmer
I know this comes as a terrible shock to you but you really have utterly no clue what you are talking about when it comes to matter economic or political.
60
posted on
12/01/2007 9:19:44 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(What drug pushers do with drugs, politicians do with government subsides)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-327 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson