Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seekthetruth
I wonder if Rush ever considered that nobody was even interested in exposing Fred's inconsistencies or past statements?

If Fred was leading in the early states and they were worrying about Fred, they may have asked him to explain this for instance:

David Brody pointed out recently that Fred Thompson is going to be hounded on the immigration issue.

Read below from a Washington Times story:

CBN NEWS: Thompson Now Officially Seeking Presidency: Some votes are likely to draw scrutiny, particularly a series of votes in the 1990s against cracking down on illegal aliens. Those include a 1995 vote against limiting services other than emergency care and public education to illegal aliens - he was one of just six senators to oppose that proposal - and a 1996 vote against creating an employer verification system to help businesses filter out illegal aliens who apply for jobs....

But on immigration, Mr. Thompson had several votes where he bucked the pack - and seemed to favor illegal aliens.

The most stark example was his 1995 vote on the welfare overhaul, when he voted to preserve illegal aliens' ability to receive federal benefits. He was one of just six senators to vote that way, joining four other Republicans and one Democrat.
http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/225944.aspx

This sounds a little like Huckabee.

60 posted on 12/01/2007 1:16:32 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate ( Unite 4 Mitt ----> STOP Huck & Rudy -----> beat Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: redgirlinabluestate

The difference is that Fred has never been for blanket amnesty of illegal immigrants. As far as those votes on legislation are concerned, do you have specifics about what was included in them that might have caused Fred to vote for or against them? That’s the problem with hanging a criticism on a couple of votes; unless you know what’s behind them, it’s hard to make a judgement.


66 posted on 12/01/2007 1:56:38 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Yes, that story came out back in September, and I believe Fred answered questions about that vote. I have read his detailed plan on illegal immigration and believe it is a great plan. It is also on his web site. :)


68 posted on 12/01/2007 2:05:31 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate

CBN dislikes Fred and takes things out of context at every opportunity in an attempt to discredit him. CBN is Pat Robertson’s organization and he, inexplicably, is for Rudy.

NumbersUSA, a hardline anti-immigration group, has come out in support of Thompson. If Thompson weren’t the real deal on immigration, NumbersUSA would know it.


73 posted on 12/01/2007 5:41:55 PM PST by LadyNavyVet (Navy 38, Army 3 ! Yes, I'm gloating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Keep swinging Red, practice makes perfect!

One day when you become a Conservative it will come in handy...


77 posted on 12/01/2007 6:10:46 PM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate

You know, Mitt supporters complaining about so-called inconsistencies on FRED’S part...boy, if that ain’t the pot calling the kettle a large black piece of cookware, then I don’t know what is.


81 posted on 12/01/2007 8:21:54 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson