It is 1984.
1 posted on
12/01/2007 3:05:55 PM PST by
fanfan
To: fanfan
Not 1984. A Clockwork Orange.
2 posted on
12/01/2007 3:07:31 PM PST by
denydenydeny
(Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
To: fanfan
“It is 1984.”
Well, it’s socialist Britain, anyway.
4 posted on
12/01/2007 3:12:37 PM PST by
ought-six
("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
To: fanfan
Hmmm National healthcare, welfare moms having kids out of wedlock, universal disarmament (of the citizenry, not the thugs) ... sounds just like what the RATs want to bring to America.
The only flaw (from the liberal POV) was that she was carrying a baby to term.
6 posted on
12/01/2007 3:15:08 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: fanfan
One could certainly argue that one of the reasons for this area’s deterioration was because there were many more like this woman who had kids only to find that “things didn’t work out” with the dad(s).Casual child bearing.Casual child rearing.The state brings home the paycheck and the kids (particularly the boys) are “mommied” (maybe) but certainly not “daddied”.
7 posted on
12/01/2007 3:15:54 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: fanfan
11 posted on
12/01/2007 3:27:33 PM PST by
Vn_survivor_67-68
(CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
