Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israelis hit Syrian ‘nuclear bomb plant’(using N. Korean plutonium)
Times of London ^ | 12/02/07 | Uzi Mahnaimi & Michael Sheridan

Posted on 12/02/2007 2:49:01 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Israelis hit Syrian ‘nuclear bomb plant’

Uzi Mahnaimi in Tel Aviv and Michael Sheridan in Seoul

ISRAEL’S top-secret air raid on Syria in September destroyed a bomb factory assembling warheads fuelled by North Korean plutonium, a leading Israeli nuclear expert has told The Sunday Times.

Professor Uzi Even of Tel Aviv University was one of the founders of the Israeli nuclear reactor at Dimona, the source of the Jewish state’s undeclared nuclear arsenal.

“I suspect that it was a plant for processing plutonium, namely, a factory for assembling the bomb,” he said. “I think the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] transferred to Syria weapons-grade plutonium in raw form, that is nuggets of easily transported metal in protective cans. I think the shaping and casting of the plutonium was supposed to be in Syria.”

All governments concerned - even the regime in Damascus - have tried to maintain complete secrecy about the raid.

They apparently fear that forcing a confrontation on the issue could spark a war between Israel and Syria, end the Middle East peace talks and wreck America’s extremely complex negotiations to disarm North Korea of its nuclear weapons.

The political stakes could hardly be higher. Plutonium is the element which fuelled the American atomic bomb that destroyed the Japanese city of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

Critics in the United States say proof that North Korea supplied such nuclear weapons material to Syria, a state technically at war with Israel, would shatter congressional confidence in the Bush administration’s diplomatic policy.

From beneath the veil of military censorship, western commentators have formed a consensus that the target was a nuclear reactor under construction.

But Even said that purely from scientific observation, he had reached a different conclusion - that it was a nuclear bomb factory, posing a more immediate danger to Israel. He said that satellite photos of the site, taken before the Israeli strike on September 6, showed no sign of the cooling towers and chimneys characteristic of nuclear reactors.

Syria’s haste after the attack to bury the site under tons of soil suggested that hundreds of square yards were contaminated and there were fears of radiation, the professor added.

Since then the Syrians have sealed up the location, levelled the site and diverted curious journalists to a place that had not been attacked by Israel.

The professor’s theory fits with authoritative technical evidence about North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme. The North Koreans are able to produce weapons-grade plutonium, which is electro-refined, alloyed and cast into shapes ready to be machined to fit into a warhead, according to a team of distinguished American nuclear weapons scientists who visited the country’s laboratories.

One of those scientists, Siegfried Hecker, was allowed to hold a sample and was told that it was “good bomb grade plutonium”, because it had a very low content of plutonium240, the isotope which reduces the overall quality of the material.

Assembly of a Nagasaki-type bomb involves mating a plutonium core with a uranium wrap and inserting a small quantity of polonium and beryllium to initiate the chain reaction.

“Plutonium is highly dangerous material,” explained the Israeli professor. “It is easily oxidised in air unless protective measures are taken. The oxide is easily dispersed as dust in air when machining plutonium to create the ‘pit’ [a hollow sphere in many nuclear weapons] and thus can be inhaled, causing a fatality in minute quantities.

“Plutonium pellets are handled and machined exclusively in a large array of ‘glove boxes’, to protect the technicians and their environment. That is why you need a relatively large containment building and cannot assemble a nuclear weapon in your garage - unless you are suicidal of course.”

The debris from a destructive raid on a weapons-building facility could therefore contain toxic radioactive waste. But the main danger for Syria would be the telltale exposure of the elements to surveillance and detection by America. This would explain the cover-up at the site.

North Korea, for its part, has more than enough plutonium to sell some of its stock to Syria.

The same team of visiting US scientists estimated that by late 2006 the nation had made 40-50kg (88-100lb) of the material. Between six and eight kilograms are needed for a weapon.

For the US and its allies the Syrian connection raises the deeply worrying possibility that North Korea has succeeded in building what the US scientists called “a sophisticated design with smaller dimensions and mass so as to fit onto a . . . medium-range missile”.

That puzzle was complicated when North Korea announced that it had tested its first nuclear bomb on October 9 last year. The yield of the blast was small - less than a 20th of the Nagasaki bomb - suggesting to some scientists that the device was sophisticated and small while others believed the North Koreans had simply not made a very good bomb.

Professor Even believes the North Koreans have not yet perfected small warheads. “The mechanical dimensioning at this stage is extremely demanding (less than 0.01mm). So is the casting of the explosives around the plutonium core and the initiation of the implosion,” he said.

The question is under urgent study by nations who might one day be targets of a North Korean device sold to Syria or Iran. Iran is known to have financed missile and weapons deals between North Korea and Syria, causing concern to Israel and the US. One day after the Israeli attack, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, sent his nephew with a personal letter to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian leader.

The professor’s theory of a clear and present danger that Damascus would get the bomb may be the only credible explanation why Israel carried out a military strike against Syria and risked an all-out conflict.

Indeed on September 6 Israel was ready for war with Syria. Israeli sources said its military chiefs assumed Syria would launch a retaliatory attack, but no reprisal came.

Meanwhile, President Bush has authorised his chief negotiator, Christopher Hill, to go on talking to North Korea in the search for a peaceful solution. Hill will visit Pyongyang this week to pursue negotiations after international technicians got to work on disabling the reactor at Yongbyon, the source of North Korea’s plutonium.

The North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il is supposed to make a full declaration of his nuclear programmes by December 31. The US says that must include information on his weapons deals with Syria and Iran.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 20070906; airstrikes; appeasement; dprk; iaf; israel; korea; nkorea; northkorea; nuclear; nuke; oldnews; sep62007; sept62007; syria; syriannukes; topsecret
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-175 next last
To: nuconvert
This is one of the most informative threads, and in the top tier information wise, of possible scenarios. The thread points out a possible means to generate an attack upon any nation using cover of charter plus other assorted methods. The enemy, I suspect, has thought of these possibilities. To slip in, under the radar, could be achieved through a variety of means, for our enemies. There can be no doubt the enemies of the civilized world are preparing. The civilized world is playing defense.

The probable truth is....Our Nation and the Civilized World has been and will continue to be at Red Alert.

Great Thread....Direct and to the Point of the Challenges which have faced and are facing the civilized world.

61 posted on 12/02/2007 7:37:03 AM PST by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLWNW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Half the job is done. Teddy is drunk enough to date Hillary...

The scary part is, they're BOTH "two-baggers".

Cheers!

62 posted on 12/02/2007 7:41:24 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

4). What was that NK ship doing in Egypt and Lebanon?


63 posted on 12/02/2007 7:41:34 AM PST by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
We are like people who keep slapping down the alarm clock and refuse to wake up.
64 posted on 12/02/2007 7:46:10 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it." George Santayana


Japanese negotiators in DC before Pearl Harbor
65 posted on 12/02/2007 7:49:08 AM PST by sono (Hillary's Campaign Theme Song? Donovan, "Season of The Witch")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If there was plutonium at the bombed-out site, the US’s and other countries’ radiation detectors would have spotted it after the raid.

So this is either disinformation or all the major powers already know Syria was experimenting with NK plutonium.

Some of the things that have happened on the international affairs front since the raid indicate the radiation detectors were pinging off the scale.


66 posted on 12/02/2007 7:57:46 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Because we have 150,000 of our finest in the same area perhaps? I don’t know, ==but food for thought.


67 posted on 12/02/2007 8:04:37 AM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways
If there was plutonium at the bombed-out site, the US’s and other countries’ radiation detectors would have spotted it after the raid.

The real question is; would they tell the public?

68 posted on 12/02/2007 8:09:08 AM PST by null and void (No more Bushes/No more Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
So what is The Times of London suggesting we do? Is the US Senate and House of Representatives ready to allow the US military to do a thorough job of destroying the NK, Syrian, and Iranian facilities even remotely associated in any way with supporting their nuclear programs.
GWB declares these three countries as being the axis of evil, and has refused to give them leeway, while his opponents continue to blast him for being so cruel and not willing to allow negotiations to evolve.
Then some clown turns around and makes a comment where it appears this administration is failing in diplomacy, whatever.
Lots of *ssholes out their IMHO.
69 posted on 12/02/2007 9:01:53 AM PST by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
"We won’t fight this war the way it should be fought until AFTER we lose an entire city and a million or so people"

Yes, and that's assuming the Islamo-jackals only go after (or succeed in going after) one city in a surprise attack. If 9-11, Madrid, and London, etc. should teach us anything it's that the Islamo-jackals aspire to carry out simultaneous mass casualty attacks (but if they had several nuclear weapons they would use them in DIFFERENT cities, not one city). If they had multiple nuclear weapons which were not being kept back as a deterrent, they (whichever jackal nation or terrorist group had acquired them) would likely try to use them in a coordinated multi-city attack to maximize the horror and slaughter. I'm very sorry to say that we have to suffer mass casualties in several cities before we finally start going after the Islamo-jackals with complete focus and necessary ruthlessness.
70 posted on 12/02/2007 9:04:52 AM PST by Enchante (Democrat terror-fighting motto: "BLEAT - CHEAT - RETREAT - DEFEAT - REPEAT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

I hear ya. These @$$holes want it to be all stick, no carrot.


71 posted on 12/02/2007 9:06:44 AM PST by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jet Jaguar; monkapotamus; Tamar1973; AmericanInTokyo; All

COOL I hope Syria can’t rebuild it LOL!


72 posted on 12/02/2007 9:19:52 AM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If this were really true, and accurate as to the plutonium, this bombed facility would be lighting up like a roman candle on ground or space based sensors.

Until I get some clarification from other sources, I remain puzzled at best.

73 posted on 12/02/2007 9:21:11 AM PST by Cold Heat (Mitt....2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
There is a growing, and increasingly capable, pact of nations, with a vested and apparently agreed upon interest in thwarting and threatening US interests around the world. I count among them, N. Korea, Syria, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, and other less capable nations. There is no doubt in my mind that they are supported by Red China (openly in terms of oil and weapons deals, and covertly in terms of logistics and planning) and that Russia, more and more, has its hands in the mix.

If allowed to fester (and it already has a sickening, puss-filled head on it), it will draw more disaffected nations to it and ultimately become a larger threat to ourselves and liberty thoughout the world than the Nazis and Imperial Japanese became in the 1930s and 1940s, and will cost more to put down. We (meaning the United States and our true allies) need to act forcefully economically and militarily now to prevent that from happening.

74 posted on 12/02/2007 9:59:39 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Bump


75 posted on 12/02/2007 10:15:36 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (CNN (debate) questioners included more hacks than a cat coughing up a hairball.-Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"The US says that must include information on his weapons deals with Syria and Iran".

I would not be surprised to see NK give up Iran and Syria...especially if confronted with some evidence. They might spill the beans.

I'm CERTAIN the US will be applying every carrot and every stick.

76 posted on 12/02/2007 10:31:17 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; CedarDave
ISRAEL’S top-secret air raid on Syria in September destroyed a bomb factory assembling warheads fuelled by North Korean plutonium, a leading Israeli nuclear expert has told The Sunday Times.

Has anyone informed Madeline Albright and Bill Richardson? Remember they both boasted of solving the NK problem ('snort!') and Bill wants to be our next POTUS!

77 posted on 12/02/2007 10:36:11 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (CNN (debate) questioners included more hacks than a cat coughing up a hairball.-Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plenipotentiary

The UN has no reason to call an emergency meeting since Syria has refused to allow its nuclear agency access to Syria’s bombed out nuclear plant.

And none will be permitted by Syria either.


78 posted on 12/02/2007 10:39:31 AM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Critics in the United States say proof that North Korea supplied such nuclear weapons material to Syria, a state technically at war with Israel, would shatter congressional confidence in the Bush administration’s diplomatic policy.

Excuse (the heck out of) me? Didn't the CLINTON administration supply North Korea with those nuclear facilities in the first place?

79 posted on 12/02/2007 10:39:50 AM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB

“If Syria got weapons grade plutonium from North Korea, why does anyone believe Iran didn’t get it some time ago? And if Iran has had weapons grade plutonium for some time now, why would anyone believe they haven’t already made weapons from it? They are far more capable than Syria.
With that in mind, has Iran been taunting Israel to strike one of Iran’s nuke sites so that Iran can retaliate with nuclear weapons while claiming self defense. Obviously Iran knows Israel will retaliate - what’s left of it - but do they really care? They need major destruction all around to bring the 12’th Imam from his hole...”

You can already see the results of this concern in the less than determinative comments coming from both Israel and the US. You hit it squarely on the head and there’s little doubt Iran had a funding and operational role in the Syrian plant.

That Iran would not have received shipments themselves is of course the most troubling aspect of this story. Thus the conditions by the US to North Korea to provide exchange information by year’s end.

My sense is that information will not be provided. But if North Korea is cornered enough to do so, expect to Tehran as one of the addresses for its atomic weapons fuel.


80 posted on 12/02/2007 10:44:15 AM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson