Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Musharraf: U.S. Shares Blame for Pakistan and Afghanistan
Good Morning America-ABC News ^ | Nov. 30, 2007

Posted on 12/02/2007 6:50:48 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Musharraf: U.S. Shares Blame for Pakistan and Afghanistan

Pervez Musharraf's Exclusive Interview With ABC News' Chris Cuomo

In an exclusive interview with "Good Morning America," Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf said the West must share blame for his country's current political crisis.

If there's a failure, it's not Pakistan's failure," Musharraf responded when asked by GMA's Chris Cuomo about the political turmoil and beleaguered anti-terrorism campaigns under way in Pakistan, particularly in the country's remote tribal regions.

On his country's search for Osama bin Laden, Musharraf refused to say what he would do if he was captured, including whether he would turn Bin Laden over to the U.S. "I think the people who need to know, know it," he said. "And I don't think the media is the one who needs to know."

Musharraf faulted the United States for its inconsistent support over the past 30 years, saying that the U.S. turned a blind eye to terrorism until Sept. 11. "We handled the situation alone for 12 years," he said.

Musharraf insists that Pakistan has been a staunch ally for the United States. He described the United States and Pakistan's support for the mujahedeen in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets by saying, "We launched a jihad together."

Stepping Down as General Tuesday Musharraf stepped down as head of the army, a position he had held, in addition to the office of the presidency, since seizing power in a 1999 coup.

Musharraf said that giving up his post in the army, where he had served for 46 years, was very emotional for him, but he did it because he felt it was in Pakistan's best domestic interests.

"It hit me at the ceremony, I think, when I handed over the baton to the new army chief of staff. That ceremony that was very nostalgic, very emotional, because I thought this is the day when I am leaving. I am no more the chief.

The move represents a dramatic turnabout for Musharraf since declaring a state of emergency and suspending the constitution earlier this month. Just yesterday he set a date to lift emergency rule by Dec. 16 and promised that "come hell or high water, elections will be held Jan. 8."

Cracking Down on the Media Musharraf has been broadly criticized for his crackdown on the media since the state of emergency.

He said he understood the West's concerns but insisted the move was necessary: "We had to crack down on the media because the media was creating despondency and despair in the public of Pakistan through distorting facts."

"I tolerate everything. I have no problem with criticism on me. Or even the government. But if that criticism is biased and distorted, distorted by design, distorted by political design, now that is where I … get agitated."

Musharraf sat down with Chris Cuomo for a 45-minute interview in Rawalpindi earlier today, his first interview since being sworn in again as president.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; musharraf; pakistan; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2007 6:50:49 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Full Transcript of Musharraf Interview

http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3937054&page=1


2 posted on 12/02/2007 6:51:25 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And what blame would that be?......Ridding the area in Afghanistan of the Taliban? This guy’s a bag.


3 posted on 12/02/2007 6:52:11 AM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: irish guard

The Pakis had a ball in Afghanistan when the Taliban were in power.


4 posted on 12/02/2007 6:53:01 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: irish guard

The Taliban wouldn’t have existed if it weren’t for the Pakistani army-

& it still continues to exist because of the same force.


5 posted on 12/02/2007 6:53:56 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

He’s blaming CLINTON and Elder BUSH!!


6 posted on 12/02/2007 7:03:23 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We can fix this easy, get rid of him.


7 posted on 12/02/2007 7:06:53 AM PST by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Pakistan has not really ever had sovereignty over the Waziristans and should explicitly acknowledge same.


8 posted on 12/02/2007 7:18:49 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
“Musharraf faulted the United States for its inconsistent support over the past 30 years, saying that the U.S. turned a blind eye to terrorism until Sept. 11.”

This must be a first, Musharraf is right but even though he’s right he could be doing a lot more.

9 posted on 12/02/2007 7:23:08 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"We had to crack down on the media because the media was creating despondency and despair in the public of Pakistan through distorting facts." "I tolerate everything. I have no problem with criticism on me. Or even the government. But if that criticism is biased and distorted, distorted by design, distorted by political design, now that is where I … get agitated."

You have to give him credit for knowing how to deal with the media. :)

10 posted on 12/02/2007 7:34:36 AM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

So does Robert Mugabe & Vladmir Putin.


11 posted on 12/02/2007 7:36:15 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Yep,the US should have looked more closely at Pakistan’s sponsorship of terrorists against India & support of the Taliban in Afghanistan- & Clinton should have declared Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism when he had the evidence-which happened more than a few times.


12 posted on 12/02/2007 7:40:09 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

LOL!

I just knew somebody was going to take my comment seriously.

I was just being a little flippant. That was the reason for the :) smiley face.


13 posted on 12/02/2007 7:42:50 AM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“On his country’s search for Osama bin Laden, Musharraf refused to say what he would do if he was captured, including whether he would turn Bin Laden over to the U.S. “I think the people who need to know, know it,” he said. “And I don’t think the media is the one who needs to know.””

Very refreshing comment, no matter the various possible interpretations.


14 posted on 12/02/2007 10:32:36 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think one thing that gets lost in the pakistan threads is that the US doesn’t have a wide range of options on who runs pakistan, AND the US is more concerned about stable secular control of the country, the army, AND THE NUKES than any platitudes about democracy, no matter what sandbagging the State Department does to the contrary.

People say Mussharaff could have done more on various topics - but what if ordering more done (or maybe he did order more done and it was ignored and we don’t know it) makes entire parts of his government just simply ignore him and/or do what they want? As far as I can tell he has been and is in a very precarious position with active forces working against him, if the multiple near-success assassination attempts are not clue enough.

I guess what I am saying is that the US isn’t going to get anyone who can replace this guy who is in overall more useful to US interests, and for the US and the West in general to be giving this guy grief about democracy is just plain stupid.

I can only hope that private contact between the US and his government is on a more realpolitikal level.


15 posted on 12/02/2007 10:40:24 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy; RedStateRocker; gonzo; DeaconBenjamin; indcons; sukhoi-30mki; Eyes Unclouded; ECM; ...
Pakistan ۋﮧ۱م

FReepmail if you want on or off
16 posted on 12/02/2007 11:00:53 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"I tolerate everything. I have no problem with criticism on me. Or even the government. But if that criticism is biased and distorted, distorted by design, distorted by political design, now that is where I … get agitated."

I think most FReepers can relate to that.

17 posted on 12/02/2007 12:47:34 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If there's a failure, it's not Pakistan's failure," Musharraf responded...

Who writes Musharraf's stuff? Ray Nagin?

18 posted on 12/02/2007 1:55:34 PM PST by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

He’s right, but the USA shouldn’t bear the entire burden. What is Iran doing to eliminate terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan? What about China and Russia, it’s their turf.


19 posted on 12/02/2007 1:59:52 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

As I have said many times over,replacing Musharraf won’t change a thing.The vast majority of the Army’s senior officers have the same viewpoints-he has survived solely because of them.The Pakistani army is a very professional force-not a oneman street show.


20 posted on 12/02/2007 8:28:41 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson