Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

It seems the F-35 would give them a lot more flexibility for their money.


2 posted on 12/02/2007 8:44:11 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

Not Australia’s decision to make.

No.


3 posted on 12/02/2007 8:46:39 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (I'm a proud Yankee Doodle Protectionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
Why would the US think about sending F22’s to Austrailia if the new PM is going to pull out his troops?
6 posted on 12/02/2007 9:01:16 PM PST by jonathan-swift2000 (The Good news from Iraq the MSM won't publish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
This could be interesting. I think Australia would be better off if they went with the F-35 due to its lower production cost and its well-roundedness as both a fighter and a ground-attack aircraft.

Plus, if it was required, they could base F-35B's (the VTOL version) off the two new amphibious assault ships that will be joining the Australian fleet soon.

Having the same aircraft stationed on land as they do at sea would help cut down on the replacement parts and mechanic training that they would be required if they had F-35's at sea and F-22's on land.

8 posted on 12/02/2007 9:22:12 PM PST by Stonewall Jackson (The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson