| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 12/04/2007 8:54:19 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
Previously posted: |
Posted on 12/04/2007 8:18:30 AM PST by GOPGuide
He is a Dem - he just hides it better.
barf - I won’t vote for McCain either.
I hope not. I worked for a guy once who had been a POW in Vietnam for an extended period. Nice enough guy, but let’s just say his issues had issues and leave it at that. I would not be comfortable with someone having the nuclear football whom I did not consider fully mentally competent. And McCain’s a decent guy, and sometimes even sort of conservative, almost, maybe, but he’s not mentally competent.
Besides, we all know that in his heart of hearts he wants amnesty. He’s playing a border hawk right now to get primary votes, but that’s not where his real sympathies lie.
You make a joke about viagra but that's exactly how many, many people will see and joke about him. While some say he appears "Presidential" many others will see him as old, tired and sick. If nominated we will have even more "old" jokes than we had when Bob Dole got the nomination. And just wait for the first "gaff"... It will be much worse than when Dole forgot which city he was in. Reagan did a great job handling the "old" stereotype and maybe there's hope that Thompson could turn around the stereotypes. I'd love to be wrong but Thompson is not Reagan and it's not 1984 any more. In fact many of the current voters were in diapers or not even born when Reagan was President.
Rudy’s mistress stories in general should be hurting him. If he was a Democrat (yes, I know an argument could be made that he is definitely a liberal) we would be raking him over the coals. Instead he gets a free pass from a lot of people.
“No, Huckabee is taking Romney out and nothing is stopping Giuliani’s free fall. That creates a best-case scenario for Fred Thompson.”
Yes, it does. And Thompson will fail to take advantage of it, leaving one man standing, Huckabee....unless your next alternative is Ron Paul.
Until you all understand that Huckabee is talking to the vast middle, and not to a bunch of “seal the borders, they’re coming!” fanatics, you just won’t understand why he’s surging in the polls.
Take his tack on Guantanamo. I really disagree with him on that one, but how many people have been convinced by the press that it should be closed. I’d wager that well over half of registered Republicans would vote to close it. If they’re saying that we should run terrorists through the criminal courts, as Clinton advocated, they’re wrong. But if they’re saying Guantanamo is hard to defend given the press it’s gotten, they’re right.
The real Guantanamo issue is: Do we move terrorists into the criminal justice system or not? Not whether or not Guantanamo remains open. Hell, pen them up in Iraq now that the security situation has improved so much. Heh, of course then the terrorists themselves might vote to keep Guantanamo open.
Huckabee is a master politician and is going to take the nomination. Statements like the one on Guantanamo only increase his odds of winning the Presidency...and he knows this.
I’m as concerned as anyone as to where he really stands on a lot of issues, but not because he won’t tell us. We just have to get by all the propaganda about his Arkansas record and start asking him where he stands. He’s the one candidate running who will just tell us. And he’s willing to concede that his stance will cost him votes with some Republicans. But at least we’ll know where he stands. Try that with Hillary, or Rudy or Mitt for that matter.
Rudy would be Hillary-Light.
Folks are figuring it out.
Guiliani, Huckabee, and McCain are 100% MSM driven. Giuliani has been proped up by NYC Fox News since day one.
McCain is just left over 2000.
Agree. We all know instinctively that Huckabee’s rise is temporary, and that Rudy and Mitt are , quite simply, flawed candidates. Fred’s patience will pay off.
leaving one man standing...Huckabee.
Well, and McCain. I’ll grant that, but I have a hard time believing the Republicans he’s back-stabbed so many times in the past are going to nominate him. The press wants him, but only until he’s the nominee. Then they’ll unload on him.
LLS
Why do you suppose the media is giddy over Mike? He is a sure loser. Some Democrats are telling people to post and write and call in to show support of Huckabee. It sure is not to help the Republicans.
I predict that Huckabee will stumble next as his "conservatism" is called into question. That will have to be FRED's time to break. If he doesn't Fred is done.
Rudy’s baggage would provide a field day for Hillary, he makes her sordid paste look clean by comparison.
I’m not sure who can beat Hillary, but I know that Hillary would beat Rootie.
Huck’s fall is exactly what Fred is waiting for. Slow and steady while everyone else self-destructs. There is still time.
Huckabee can enjoy it while it lasts. When the investigations begin, he will be toast.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/op-ed/editorial2/20071203-9999-mz1ed3bottom.html
“I don’t see Huckabee winning anywhere but perhaps Iowa.”
I concur. And since a win in Iowa is basically meaningless these days, so what? I think the Huckster’s 15 minutes are going to be up pretty soon.
How was Huckabee, in general, received on Fox News? Did not watch the show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.