Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Bomb That Was Not [From our Saudi allies, who will also have nukes.]
Arab News (Saudi Arabia) ^ | 05DEC07 | Arab News (Saudi Arabia)

Posted on 12/04/2007 7:14:40 PM PST by familyop

After the lies and manipulation of intelligence concerning Saddam’s WMD that preceded Washington’s Iraq adventure, there were always reasonable grounds for doubting George Bush’s similar saber-rattling assertions about Iran’s supposed nuclear weapons’ program. Now the revelations of the US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) prove how justified those doubts were. Bush who had, among other things, claimed — completely against the record — that Iran had declared it wanted to build a nuclear weapons arsenal, is shown once again to be creating a fabric of misinformation, which he may well have been planning to use as justification for US airstrikes on Iran.

The 16 US spy agencies that contribute to the NIE are, however, now saying that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003, even though in 2005, the NIE asserted that the drive for nuclear armament was continuing. It is easy to believe that the CIA, which Bush made the fall guy for the false intelligence on Iraq’s WMD, is determined not to be manipulated this way again. Maybe the calculation at Langley has been that in the twilight months of his gloomy presidency, Bush was perfectly capable of one last shot at Tehran in revenge for the difficulties the Iranians have created for the US occupation forces in Iraq. The CIA recognized how dangerous and destabilizing such a stupid attack would be.

The blustering that has come out of the White House in the wake of the release of the NIE assessment would almost be amusing if the subject were not so serious. A Bush spokesman has insisted that pressure on Iran must be maintained. Predictably, the British government has echoed this stance. It is more of a surprise that France’s President Sarkozy has delivered a similar judgment. Why has he chosen to rubberstamp the risky Bush policy when the facts on which it is based have been shown to be wrong? The NIE estimates that if Iran resumed its atomic weapons program today, the country could not build its first bomb until 2015. This may, however, itself prove to be as wrong as its 2005 assertion that the program was continuing.

What is clear, on the other hand, is that the path of negotiation led by China and Russia remains the best option. Since Bush will now find it almost impossible to find an excuse to attack Iran, the poison of the threat has been removed from negotiations. The responsibility now rests with Tehran to honor its international treaty obligations and let IAEA officials perform the full range of inspections they are entitled to make. Diplomatically, there is probably not a finer moment for the Iranians to do this. Bush has suffered yet another blow to what little remains of his credibility. Iran can drive the point home by yielding fully to the inspection regime to which it earlier agreed.

If it refuses to do so, it may give Bush another albeit weak opportunity for renewed belligerence. Tehran should not, at the same time, forget this president’s well-known ability to act with catastrophic consequences on the basis of lies.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; nuclear; proliferation; weapons
Iran has repeatedly offered to share nuclear technology (for peaceful reasons, of course) with the Saudis.
1 posted on 12/04/2007 7:14:46 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Have you really believed that the Arabs dislike the Iranians more than they dislike us?


2 posted on 12/04/2007 7:18:46 PM PST by familyop (Roma est perdita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

for some reason I think the US is a little more unsafe today than it was before the release of the NIE report.

Appeasement??? Stand down??? That’s exactly what our enemies have been waiting for!


3 posted on 12/04/2007 8:10:40 PM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

“After the lies and manipulation of intelligence concerning Saddam’s WMD..”

Say raghead, how did all those Kurds in the North die back in the ‘80’s? Was that just a passing cold front? Funny how so many of them died in horrific poses. Guess they just couldn’t handle 60 degree weather, huh?


4 posted on 12/04/2007 9:22:59 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

From the same Saudi Arabia who welcomed us with open arms when Saddam was poised to overrun their oil fields immediately after storming through Kuwait.

I say give em all nukes. They’ll end up using them against each other and solve all our problems for us. Turn what’s left over to Isreal.


5 posted on 12/05/2007 12:10:38 PM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
"From the same Saudi Arabia who welcomed us with open arms when Saddam was poised to overrun their oil fields immediately after storming through Kuwait."

Well, King Faad was pretty friendly. Most of the others hated us and secretly resented him then as much as they do now.
6 posted on 12/05/2007 2:45:53 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson