To: kinoxi
“I guess that whole building a wall concept is far too complicated to work in reality...”
Building a real fence is too cheap. Boeing saw an opportunity in the push for a fence and offered an expensive facsimile from which it could profit with building costs and decades of maintenance contracts. It presumably pushed politicians to support this boondoggle and voila, we have the ironically named “virtual fence”.
3 posted on
12/05/2007 5:04:47 PM PST by
Shermy
("A rising tide lifts all boats" ...but lowers those on the other side of the ocean.)
To: Shermy
Yeah, a (properly built) masonry wall would last hundreds of years and require very little in the form of upkeep. Why use what’s been proven to work over thousands of years when flashy graphics can net millions (billions?) off the government teat?
5 posted on
12/05/2007 5:11:38 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: Shermy
Apparently when this “virtual fence” reacts to an intruder, “non-virtual” personnel have to respond. It seems like smugglers could hire any number of human decoys to probe and activate this system simultaneously and overwhelm the responders.
15 posted on
12/05/2007 6:07:39 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Shermy
"Boeing saw an opportunity in the push for a fence and offered an expensive facsimile from which it could profit with building costs and decades of maintenance contracts."You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. I worked the proposal for this contract on another team, and this is what the government wanted! Don't go blaming the contractor.
28 posted on
12/06/2007 10:22:13 AM PST by
Redleg Duke
("All gave some, and some gave all!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson