The part about where one person could have a patent on our food supply and doom us all to starvation when he doesn’t get his way? That IS what you’re getting at, isn’t it.
The problem with that is, if he doesn’t allow a food supply, he, himself, will not get the royalties on his patent. It’s economic suicide for him, and once all those people starve to death, it’s probably REAL suicide for him, as there’ll be few people around to help him.
You have more to worry about from Hillary Clinton than you do from gene patent holders.
The patent is for global warming friendly livestock.
The EPA also has released restrictions on livestock they don’t consider global warming friendly.
The EPA also has executive power of depopulation.
What do you interpret that as?