Perhaps the same. He is EXCELLENT on military issues and particularly China/North Korea issues—extremely knowledgeable—which is half the battle. That makes it a royal flush for me, at least.
I agree with your post, all but the two candidates being the same. Hunter has actually done something about illegal immigration. He, of course wrote the bill for the fence which Bush refuses to build. He has wrote legislation for more border patrol, time after time, it gets passed but the executive just ignores it. I thought a law was to be enforced by the executive. Apparently laws are just suggestions the executive may enforce if they so choose. So, that is why I think Hunter is by far the best on this issue. He has done something to try and solve it for the last 20 years. Also, a matter of months ago, he wasn’t talking about “giving them some aspirations of citizenship”.
I am with you China/NK, a strong defense and immigration/illegal immigration are the priorities.