[cgbg]

I think lie detectors also wouldn't work well with people who habitually lie.

The average Hillary speech has at least a lie per sentence. If I were retired I might just follow her around the country and document every single lie for a week. That probably would involve writing down over a thousand lies and then writing a couple of paragraphs each explaining why it was a lie.

I think the Clintons depend on just wearing out their opposition with a blizzard of nonsense.

One example a few weeks ago were Hillary's comments on SCHIP and the family the Democrats chose as their example of how great the program was.

After one great FR poster, then bloggers, and then some of our favorite media outlets blasted this family as wealthy and probably tax cheats, Hillary accused George Bush and the Republican Congress of attacking the family's reputation.

Of course, W and the Republican Congress were wimping out as usual, afraid to take on the MSM propaganda machine, and had not said one word on the subject.

Hillary's lies were blatant and easy verifiable.

[Rocky]

I think the Clintons depend on just wearing out their opposition with a blizzard of nonsense.

That's it in a nutshell.

[weegee]

I think lie detectors also wouldn't work well with people who habitually lie.

"Remember, Jerry... It's not a lie if YOU believe it." George Costanza to Jerry Seinfeld on how to beat a lie detector machine.