Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: puroresu
One can only wonder how big the massacre would have been if the population of Massachusetts or Connecticut had been 1/3 black in 1850. Guess that's why most blacks stayed right where they were when they were freed.

They didn't have much of a choice.

71 posted on 12/10/2007 11:33:16 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
They didn't have much of a choice.

People without a penny to their name managed to migrate from across the sea to America. Ditto for people in the Eastern part of America, who moved West. Why couldn't blacks mass migrate to the North? To this day, the descendants of the freed slaves still live mostly in the South. Either they weren't treated that badly down here, or they knew they'd be treated exactly the same way by New Yorkers and Vermonters and, yes, Kansans.

There was no significant movement of blacks to the North until after WWI, when industrial jobs attracted poor blacks and whites both to some Northern areas. And what was one of the first things blacks did when they arrived in their new locale? It was to charge the local whites with "racism".

Ever hear of Brown vs. The Board of Education of Topeka, KANSAS?

In Detroit (which you once noted was part of the United States, though we might wish it wasn't), black kids grow up being told that the city was run by racists until blacks took the place over during the years 1968-1972, when the white population largely fled to escape black violence.

76 posted on 12/11/2007 4:55:02 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson