Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

You need to read some history, my friend.

The vast majority of trade was between the Southern states and Europe; the North exported nothing, and imported very little. The South, on the other hand, exported almost its goods and products, and imported a great deal of what it needed and wanted in return. Eli Whitney’s little invention was a marvel, no?


87 posted on 12/14/2007 5:19:21 PM PST by ought-six ("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six
The vast majority of trade was between the Southern states and Europe; the North exported nothing, and imported very little.

Then why were almost all of those goods landed in three Northern ports? If they were destined for Southern consumers why didn't they go straight to Southern ports?

The South, on the other hand, exported almost its goods and products, and imported a great deal of what it needed and wanted in return.

A grear deal? In one sentence you say that they imported almost everything and then suddenly it's a great deal. There is a paradox in what you claim, if the North imported next to nothing then why, based on revenue collections, did all the goods land there? What sense is there to bringing goods destined for South Carolina to New York, land them, pay tariffs, load them again, and send them South?

89 posted on 12/15/2007 4:42:19 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson