Posted on 12/09/2007 6:35:35 PM PST by JRochelle
You’re ready for your Badge!
Yes, this from a poster who called someone a liar for commenting on the numeric order in a poll since the MOE theoretically made it a tie, and then the next day posted a poll in numeric order complete with color-coding for the “leaders”, when in that poll the top 4 were also in a “tie” based on the MOE.
You wouldn’t know a lie if it appeared in one of your posts. At least you haven’t yet.
One for the Freeper Awards! : )
ROTFL!
Oh, I’ve known the score for a while. I don’t need a badge for pointing out the obvious.
It amazes me that people are so obsessed with their attacks that they are willing to dismiss so many of their principles.
If anybody had tried to defend McCain last summer with that “it’s just a procedural vote” argument, they’d have been laughed off the site.
No, I protested the lie of stating a lead where there was a statistical tie.
You should proofread your posts, you've begun embarrassing yourself.
Yet I bet you carry one. You know, the secret one that Uncle Willard gave you . . .
No, just hypocrisy. I don’t expect you to understand. The entire discussion was like something from Alice in the Looking Glass, as is most of the arguments against Romney here.
I wish Fred would come up in the polls so his supporters could get this chip off their shoulder.
Link please.
To be fair, which I doubt you intended to be, you would have pinged this poster to your lecture also:
Bring on the paid Mitt apologists.... 32 posted on 12/09/2007 7:13:40 PM PST by Afronaut
He just sent me a nice Christmas Card. It quoted scripture and everything. And I’ve never even sent him money — I did collect signatures.
I also collected signatures for Fred, I wonder if he’ll send me a christmas card?
Your claims remain unproven, your credibility tattered.
The desperation shown in posting this non-issue thread sure makes me laugh.
Irony can be so damned ironic. I wish Willard would plummet further in the polls so his supporters could wipe the arrogance from their dripping lips.
You need a link for your own post? You know I think your color-coding was fine, because I don’t have an agenda which has short-circuited my higher brain function. I knew you were just using the numbers the pollster gave you, and highlighting which two candidates had the highest numbers.
You were even kind enough to list MOE as an entry so those who actually knew what MOE means (Margin of Error) could do their own math and see the top 4 were tied for the lead.
The odd thing is that if you were consistant in your complaints about what really is typical campaign rhetoric, I’d at least have some respect for you as a man of principle and conviction.
As it is, I see you attacking basic campaign tactics, but only when they are used by people you hate.
If you seriously can’t remember your own thread posting, I’ll look it up for you, I have the technology.
Do I need to scan the christmas card? I wasn’t aware that we were expecting proof of things like that. Pretty petty I think — I could get Mitt to send you one if you are jealous.
I watched an interview tonight on CNN with Huckabee and another interview on CNN with Romney and after they were done speaking I sent my second donation to Fred Thompson.
At least you know that this entire thread is a non-issue. Some people think telling the truth about McCain’s vote to keep social security for illegals in the immigration bill is a problem. I’m certain if Thompson had pointed it out they’d be high-fiving themselves for how great Thompson was to “go after” the truth.
Post the link to provide proof of your claim.
Thank you for doing something positive to support your candidate. If more people would positively support their candidate rather than trying to beat people into voting their way, their candidate might not be having so much trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.