Imagine.... a guy who wants babies to be killed also has some other moral indiscretions.... Say it ain’t so!
Why is it that people always act surprised when they elect someone with known bad morals and they find out their bad morals don’t just apply to one specific sin?
It amazed me that people thought Bill Clinton a known adulterer would clean up his act if he became the most powerful man in the world and acted surprised that not only would he continue his adultery but he would even go so far as to lie and say he did not have sexual relations with that woman. Oh my goodness! Not only does he piss on his marriage vows and make his wife, daughter, and nation a laughing stock but he fibs too ... How can this be? It is almost as if poor moral character can manifest itself in more than one way or instance ... Who could have thunk it?
Now I look forward to my fellow countrymen electing Bill Clinton’s wife who is known to be far more crooked and less religious than even Bill. We know she stole secret intelligence files, We know she was at the heart of the Whitewater scandal, She was at the heart of the White House travel office scandal, We know she’s broken campaign finance laws for more money and more often than any other candidate, and in many things far worse the trail seems to point towards Hillary’s desire to win at any cost. She has planted questions in campaign events. She was also complicit in covering up Bill’s womanizing past and present. When she has demonstrated and even written a thesis saying it is acceptable to do wrong if it is for a good cause, how stupid are we if we even trust this crook for a second. Apparently She feels that everything she does is for a good cause and so the laws just don’t apply to a caped crusader for socialist justice like herself.
Can I be the first to go on record as saying that if She gets elected we’ll see federal corruption like never before.
It is so much a part of who she is, it is as if “corruption for our cause” is her platform. And her Democrat backers know she’s crooked and revel in it. They seemingly say “She may be a crook, but she is our crook, and she is good at it”. Not only will she be horribly corrupt if elected, but the entire Democrat side of D.C. will know from day one that it is open season for graft, corruption, and any other sort of evil they want to get away with once Hillary is queen! And even the RINOs will be able to get in on it if they are willing to sell their souls to her.
Our kids will foot the bill and have to clean politics up the hard way if we let Hillary win.
In my humble opinion a Rudy G. Administration would also not be led by conscience. Rudy has had numerous affairs, appointed crooks and done all the things that point to him being a man who puts his own interest above absolute moral purity. Nobody is absolutely morally pure, but it makes a huge difference if a person believes it is worth striving for.
I listened to Tim Russert grill Rudy yesterday. It wasn’t that Rudy managed to slip through the questioning. But Rudy answered every question and when he made mistakes in the past, admitted them and took responsibility. Like him or hate him, he was admirable in this interview.