Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2007 5:21:58 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 12/10/2007 5:22:27 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Lend lease... ...


4 posted on 12/10/2007 5:39:14 AM PST by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
If under the terms of the NATO treaty, the NATO organization has committed itself to Afghanistan, then why is there an issue about having enough troops?

What was the nature of the agreement if everyone gets to make their own decisions about troop involvement anyway? Why have a treaty if no one is obligated to participate after the organization has decided to act?

If this is NATO, why are we still involved in that organization?

6 posted on 12/10/2007 7:06:20 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson