Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomwarrior998

Freedomwarrior998,

Well, my example of Columbine was not wrong. However, if the police have updated their tactics to actually go in then I applaud them for it. I did not know that and you do not hear about it. You are correct that still does not change the fact that we need armed citizens to thwart these maniacs due to police response times.

One last thing, by saying this I am not anti-cop. I am merely stating facts regarding police. It is true also that their job is not to necessarily stop crime but to process the crime scene and investigate it. There is a Supreme Court case ( I can’t remember the name of it ) that basically says that cops are not duty bound to protect you. In other words, though I’m sure a lot of cops would protect citizens, it’s not in their job description and we as citizens cannot count on it. We have to count on ourselves.

If you are a police officer, don’t take this the wrong way.


67 posted on 12/11/2007 8:07:37 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden
In other words, though I’m sure a lot of cops would protect citizens, it’s not in their job description

Funny, all these years I've heard the police motto is "To Serve & Protect." Just a catch-phrase for passing more laws and resticting the law-abiding I suppose.

92 posted on 12/11/2007 11:25:39 AM PST by subterfuge (HILLARY IS: She who must NOT be Dismayed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson