“honestly....a rehash of the clintons past exploits isnt gonna cut it on the campaign to beat the frost queen.
articulate and brutal beating of her ideas and policies will do better.”
Why not both? Hellary’s main argument is that she was a full partner in the KKKlinton Admin and wants to share the “credit”. If that is the case she also shares the blame for every scandal. She should be asked to expain her role in every one of them. She should be asked to prove how many cabinet meetings she attended (and provide proof she was there). She be asked her role in every major decision. What was her role in selling the Lincoln bedroom, campaign contribution violations, her role in the dont ask don’t tell decision, etc etc. I think her answer will be that she knew nothing about any of it, and this will show that her “experience” argument is a sham.
since its all been brought out before...lets just call it whip cream and cherry...but the subsance the cake of calling her out on her ideas...asking about policy with details should be first n formost!.
mmmm i be wanten some cake now....mmmmm chocolate :)