[SomeReasonableDude]

The theory is somewhat reasonable and grounded - it's essentially studying the relationship of melatonin levels to breast cancer risk. So, exposure to light and sleep patterns are directly relevant as possible contributing factors.

Honestly, I don't understand what the big stink is about here. The study itself claimed a correlation, not a conclusion.

[Slapshot68]

“The study itself claimed a correlation, not a conclusion.”

Those type of studies seem to be dominating the MSM headlines.

[r9etb]

Honestly, I don't understand what the big stink is about here. The study itself claimed a correlation, not a conclusion.

From what I can tell, the Waterbury Republican-American assumes that studies like this one are ultimately political in nature, and so it dismisses them out of hand.

Guilty, IOW, of the very sin they purport to be pointing out.

I've learned to ignore them as a reliable source for commentary.