1 posted on
12/12/2007 3:11:35 PM PST by
SmithL
To: SmithL
$.7 Trillion dollars, spending in Washington will never, ever, ever be reigned in and controlled.
2 posted on
12/12/2007 3:21:01 PM PST by
rednesss
(Fred Thompson - 2008)
To: SmithL
Better headline, “Bush Defeats Dems Again.”
3 posted on
12/12/2007 3:21:30 PM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: SmithL
While I am all for national defense, I am NOT for national bankruptcy! This is TOO MUCH! A half a trillion dollars??!! That’s $2,000 per American! We don’t need to spend that to properly defend this nation.
5 posted on
12/12/2007 3:28:03 PM PST by
CodeToad
To: SmithL; PJ-Comix
I can’t wait to see the reactions in DUmmieland. The Dems failed again. Bush wins.
6 posted on
12/12/2007 3:30:11 PM PST by
Pinkbell
(Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
To: SmithL
This is a start.
And I agree that we should take better care of our soldiers then we take care of people whose only claim to being an American is that they were born here.
Without our soldiers we are nothing!
9 posted on
12/12/2007 3:42:41 PM PST by
rocksblues
(Just enforce the law!)
To: SmithL
17 posted on
12/12/2007 4:58:35 PM PST by
proudofthesouth
(Liberalism IS a mental illness.)
To: SmithL
A policy bill that does not fund. Great.
18 posted on
12/12/2007 4:59:47 PM PST by
RightWhale
(anti-razors are pro-life)
To: SmithL
This needs to be in breaking news.
22 posted on
12/12/2007 5:09:48 PM PST by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: SmithL
The real story is what is tailgating on the backside of this bill. This country needs a Line Veto so badly it cannot be said well enough.
To: SmithL
Instead of trying to build newer and bigger weapons of destruction, we should be thinking about getting more use out of the ones we already have. - Jack Handey
85 posted on
12/13/2007 1:02:57 PM PST by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson