“Call Duncan Hunter a hawkish protectionist, if you must.”
Duncan is my congressman, I never called him anything.
Someone ignorant of the candidates histories, posted that Fred had zero credentials for leading the U.S. in a foreign policy sense and I corrected that in post 19. Pointing out that until July when some people thought his only activity was acting, actually Fred was chairman of the International Security Advisory Board at the United States Department of State September 2005 — July 2007 along with the rest of the long list of his extensive foreign affairs experiences. That is all.
Okay, thanks for the post.
Hunter is better on WOT and foreign policy. He’s a better candidate. His character is sterling. And yesterday he won the debate, by an objective analysis. Of course, there’s some subjectivity because I’m a Hunter supporter, but no one accused me of subjectivity when I was saying that Intrade showed Huckabee to be the winner of debates.
.
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
As Col. David Hunt, an expert in combating terror organizations, stated in his book, “They Just Don’t Get It”, maybe of those bureaucratic committees get in the way more than do good.