Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnalogReigns
Here he seems to make it clear that he does not necessarily believe that his position on abortion should extend to non-Christians:

He said, "Not everyone in the country is a Christian, so the law has to compromise to reflect different aspects of the discussion, for example if a rape was involved."

"However, I do think the time limit for abortions is too high, especially as medical science is allowing us to keep foetuses alive that are under even 23 weeks old. This is something that needs to be discussed further."

15 posted on 12/14/2007 6:22:46 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

I fully agree with you, he is wrong on this point—and would be labeled as “pro-choice” in the USA, as he buys the line that abortion is inevitable, so the state must make it safe (and therefore available). Such, you and I both agree is hogwash—believed by the gullible.

That’s still not the same thing as endorsing abortion.


16 posted on 12/14/2007 7:33:41 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson