I agree it was covert, but I read it the same way that Bellicosity did even before the comments. It seemed to me that the police were hinting that the armed home invasion was really a drug dealer trying to get money out of a junkie, or something similar. We shall see.
You mean the other way around. Dealers have money stashed around the house, junkies don't
Even if it wasa a dealer robbing a junkie, the same laws apply, so why is the history important? Does a junkie not have a right to defend himself? I think the PD needs to take a chill pill and move on to start documenting the history of another crime.