Skip to comments.
New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary? (Tomorrow?)
Riehl World View ^
| 12/15/07
Posted on 12/15/2007 8:27:52 AM PST by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-263 next last
To: LdSentinal
Be still my beating heart.....
2
posted on
12/15/2007 8:29:21 AM PST
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: LdSentinal
3
posted on
12/15/2007 8:29:28 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: LdSentinal
Just getting the dirt out now so after she is nominated they can claim “that is old news” to excuse not covering it during the General Election.
4
posted on
12/15/2007 8:29:59 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Hillary Clinton has never done one thing right. She thinks that qualifies her to be President?)
To: LdSentinal
We already know his library collected huge contributions from anti-democracy Saudis.
5
posted on
12/15/2007 8:30:38 AM PST
by
cookcounty
(Ja-pan Jack Murtha, The ex-Marine who thinks Okinawa is on his Middle East map.)
To: LdSentinal
I do believe that’s gonna leave a mark.
6
posted on
12/15/2007 8:30:46 AM PST
by
Petronski
(Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
To: LdSentinal
7
posted on
12/15/2007 8:30:48 AM PST
by
REDWOOD99
To: LdSentinal
I think Rush said that when the NYT turns on her it will essentially be over.
8
posted on
12/15/2007 8:32:17 AM PST
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: LdSentinal
“Better put some ice on that...”
9
posted on
12/15/2007 8:32:23 AM PST
by
Clioman
To: LdSentinal
Early CHRISTMAS Present???
10
posted on
12/15/2007 8:32:57 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: LdSentinal
She began the campaign way too early, but then she didn’t ask me. It’s definitely going to be another 4 years of the GOP.
11
posted on
12/15/2007 8:33:02 AM PST
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: REDWOOD99
Popcorn, please!
12
posted on
12/15/2007 8:33:18 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: LdSentinal
New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary Oh please oh please oh please let Bill be standing next to her when it happens.
13
posted on
12/15/2007 8:33:53 AM PST
by
fhayek
To: LdSentinal
It’s over, Obama is their guy.
And now, who will the Republicans choose?
14
posted on
12/15/2007 8:33:57 AM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
To: LdSentinal
she did not divulge as she was supposed to, according to Senate rules, and we have ethics experts raising questions about that."
UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES???? YOWSER!!
15
posted on
12/15/2007 8:34:10 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: LdSentinal
After 8 years of Monica, Whitewater, disappearing documents, bimbo eruptions, Chinese campaign donations, probable rape, selling of technology to our enemy, dead Clinton enemies, etc., there’s probably no story out there that can bring down the Clinton dynasty.
Those that support the Clintons have already accepted the fact that they’re evil and they have choosen to overlook it.
16
posted on
12/15/2007 8:34:21 AM PST
by
Hazwaste
(Now with added lemony freshness!)
To: Victor
I think Rush said that when the NYT turns on her it will essentially be over.Well, that means that we would not longer have to worry about a dangerous Stalinist,(Mrs. Clinton), and would have to start worrying about an incompetent liberal, (Ubama).
17
posted on
12/15/2007 8:34:44 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
("Liberals want to save the world for the children they aren't having." -Mark Steyn)
To: Victor
When you are no longer inevitable, all the punches pulled previously when you were inevitable may land at once.
Still this does not sound like that big a deal to me. I can not imagine implication of the donor list could be anything that the public at large could easily understand. It can not be even as simple as Chinese dishwahsers donating several months pay to he campaign?
18
posted on
12/15/2007 8:34:45 AM PST
by
JLS
To: LdSentinal
What the ‘Times’ buildeth, the ‘Times’ will taketh away....
19
posted on
12/15/2007 8:35:05 AM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(A dyslexic, agnostic insomniac asks, "Is there a doG?")
To: LdSentinal
But the NIE says that Pinch Sulzberger is at least five years away from acquiring a nucelar weapon.
20
posted on
12/15/2007 8:35:21 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-263 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson