And that’s a fair take on it IMO. I would expect some clarification if that were the case though.
The problem for me is that there doesn’t seem to be anyone pleading the case of reason at these conferences. Every nation on the planet lines up behind blithering loonacy and even we seem rather timid to stand up and say this is nonsense, and here are the reasons why.
How can we ever prevail using this tactic?
We should be lining up scientists by the thousands to lay out an alternative view on all this. Instead we scamper around like church mice trying not to be noticed.
No we didn’t sign on, but we made it look like it’s only a matter of time before we will.
Well .. the state dept has always believed they were superior to any American President - and therefore they are willing to challenge Bush’s authority - as far as I’m concerned, it’s just more of the Bush-derangement syndrome.
But .. even if somebody at the meeting had “signed on” - wouldn’t Congress have to ratify such an agreement ..?? And .. if that’s true .. “signing on” could end up being worthless.