Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contrary to pundits, not everybody loves Huckabee
Boston Globe ^ | Dec. 13, 2007 | Dan Payne

Posted on 12/15/2007 9:46:36 AM PST by FocusNexus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: dufekin
That’s probably 35% of Democrats for Hillary and 8% of Republicans for Huckabee before his recent climatic surge in the polls

My read from the story is that it was a hypothetical general election matchup. If it's comparing the share of the two in their separate and respective primaries, then it's like comparing apples and plankton -- it's meaningless.

This poll is worthless.

Or, at least, the reporting of it is. If this is a general election poll, it leaves 57% of the electorate unaccounted for. It it's two primary polls, it's meaningless because they are not -- as yet -- competing with each other. It's like comparing American League and National League stats in the regular season, when the games are played under different rules. The World Series determines the outcome.

21 posted on 12/15/2007 10:45:12 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan

The above poll in Arkansas points to a larger problem.

If the GOP nominates either of the two northeastern Yankees with liberal records on abortion and “gay rights” — Rudy or Romney — they will put even some southern states at risk against the Dems.

Huckabee, McCain, Thompson...all of them would carry a solid south, with Florida the contest it always is. (Though the poll suggests that Huck may be the only GOPer who can carry Arkansas against the state’s former First Lady.)


22 posted on 12/15/2007 10:50:13 AM PST by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

I sure don’t.


23 posted on 12/15/2007 11:01:02 AM PST by Beckwith (<the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan

Winning Arkansas is not the same as winning the general election.


24 posted on 12/15/2007 11:34:25 AM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

“Winning Arkansas is not the same as winning the general election.”

Having managed my first campaign 29 years ago, I nonetheless appreciate the tutoring, Focus.

But in fact, winning Arkansas is probably necessary to win the general election, and current polling — which can change, of course — indicates that only Huckabee would beat Hillary in Arkansas.

I think your point, however, was that Huckabee’s leading Hillary in Arkansas does not mean he would beat her nationally. Of course. And I suggested no such thing based on the Rasmussen findings in Arkansas; I merely rebutted the original assertion that Huck isn’t liked in or couldn’t win Arkansas.

But turns out I come fully armed on the broader general election question as well, with scientific data indicating that Huckabee has the biggest lead over Hillary nationwide of any GOP candidate:

ZOGBY INTERNATIONAL
November 26, 2007

General election match-ups show the New York senator would lose against every top Republican

UTICA, New York – A new Zogby Interactive survey shows Democrat Hillary Clinton of New York would lose to every one of the top five Republican presidential contenders, representing a reversal of fortune for the national Democratic front–runner who had led against all prospective GOP opponents earlier this year.

Huckabee 44% +5
Clinton 39

Thompson 44% +4
Clinton 40

McCain 42% +4
Clinton 38

Giuliani 43% +3
Clinton 40

Romney 43% +3
Clinton 40

The online survey included 9,150 likely voters nationwide, and was conducted Nov. 21–26, 2007. It carries a margin of error of +/– 1.0 percentage points.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1393


25 posted on 12/15/2007 12:39:50 PM PST by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Reporters considered him petty, thin-skinned, self-righteous, and ethically challenged.

How strange. That's exactly the way I perceive him today.

26 posted on 12/15/2007 12:54:25 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

I have heard that Michael Medved is.


27 posted on 12/15/2007 2:26:10 PM PST by RatsDawg (Hsu out the Democrats in 2008!, Go Hsu-less vote GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Reporters considered him petty, thin-skinned, self-righteous, and ethically challenged.

Sounds like Hillary and Bill.

28 posted on 12/15/2007 9:21:06 PM PST by pray4liberty (The Truth sinks people whose only recourse is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson